I don't know what is going on with anti-gay Christians and posting questions for people to answer as a gimmick. First Brown did; "6 Questions for a Gay Christian." Then DeYoung went hog wild with; "40 Questions for Christians Waving Rainbow Flags (see that little dig in the title?)." And now Brown is doing more questions because the well doesn't run dry yet with questions for these people. I think the questions need to stop because people aren't looking for questions, they're looking for answers.
First, these are loaded questions, but still answerable without going into the direction the questioner wants you to go if you know how to do it.
1. Can you give me a single, unambiguous biblical example of a God-blessed (God-blessed = marriage) homosexual relationship?
You're trying to make a prohibition from a Biblical silence. Putting words in the mouth of Christ in saying He is forbidding gay marriage when He didn't say a word on it. Jesus was speaking on divorce and spoke about the historical fact of what happened in the Garden of Eden with the creation of the first man and woman. You're reading between the lines a moral absolute with forbidding gay marriage from what was only an historic narrative and saying it is forbidden out of sheer assumption from your bias. That's pure eisegesis.
2. Do you agree that every reference to homosexual practice in the Bible is decidedly negative?
No. I've showed the Centurion and his servant was a homosexual relationship and even answered Gagnon's 6 points in claiming it wasn't. Scholarly work on the historical record shows "born eunuchs" fit the definition of a homosexual male in antiquity.
Matthew Vines was brought up to me by someone and to be honest I've never heard Matthew speak. A while back I debated a man on YouTube who used James White* to refute Vines with being a gay Christian. I was refuting White's arguments against Vines' when I didn't even know what Vines said. I didn't want to listen to Vines AND listen to White's counter arguments that are almost 6 hours long (still with me?) because I don't have that kind of time so I just cut out the middle man, Vines, and went directly to what White said.
*White is cited most by anti-gay lay Christians who can't keep up on the level of a Robert Gagnon. The first thing out of White's mouth in the only debate I saw him in was a lie. He claimed the other written source at the time of Paul to use the word arsenokoite put the word in the context of homosexuality, it didn't. The source (Sibylline Oracles) used the word in talking about an economic injustice and not homosexuality that would have bolstered his point in the debate. I did a little digging and isn't the great scholar he claims to be.
White calls himself "Doctor"
and this Christian-based website addresses those in ministry who claim that title for themselves (White is a side
White has actually talked about this and it's another perfect
example of how good he is with turning the tables with an argument an
opponent brings to his face. Instead of being defensive, he goes on the
offensive with making it about the critic being a Mormon with an ax to grind (irrelevant, facts are facts) how he has more hours over the Mormon's own credit hours (again, irrelevant and childish with saying; "I have more than you do!") and makes it sound like you're elitist if you question
on-line schools. BUT, he's called out others on their
own education and the only difference between my point that I would make
with the Bible and White's is he has a "Doctor" before his name and
solely on that people will give more weight to his points than would be given to the points of a lay person just as knowledgeable. White also mentions his degree from Fuller, a seminary taken seriously only by anti-gay Evangelicals that prohibits homosexuality in the school's own "Community Standard's" Policy.
The only other schooling White has received was from "Grand Canyon University," another on-line school who by their own admission are on par with ITT Technical School. It's not a leap to say no serious scholar on Koine Greek would take White seriously.
I don't bother with a separate post refuting White on the "clobber passages" because he brings up the same arguments I've already refuted on this blog and on a video by a YouTube poster named Tom Kent. White has two YouTube accounts (Alpha & Omega Ministries and DrOakley1689) that he's disabled all comments on and states you cannot copy or redistribute any of his videos because he's a control freak with criticism and fears he'll be refuted in comments, a valid concern that has taken place before and was the cause of his wiping out and disabling all comments. I noticed he's also a master debater, his bread and butter. The thing with master debaters is that they can make you believe anything with a half believable line, that's what they do.